Sent August 20 to Gov. Robert F.
McDonnell (VA), Sen. John Hoeven (ND) and Rep. Marsha Blackburn (TN), the
leaders of the platform committee.
To the Republican Platform
Committee:
We urge positive mention of
passenger rail service in the 2012 Republican platform. Relevant
quotations from the 2000 and 2008 Republican platforms are at the bottom of
this message. We urge a revival of something close to the 2000 wording,
shown in red near the bottom of this message, and offer the following
justification.
Transportation is a foundation on which economic activity has been and will
be built in the U.S. We need to invest in an expanded, flexible and
cost-effective transportation system. Rail in general and passenger rail in
particular makes sense as part of that flexible and cost effective
transportation system. This is especially important because the U.S.
population is expected to grow by 100 million by 2050, airlines are leaving
many short-distance markets, and we will not be able to maintain the mobility
that supports a robust economy without offering people in many markets,
particularly small communities and rural areas, the choice to travel by rail.
Amtrak has shown significant improvements, with record ridership and
revenues and reduced need for operating assistance. It has shown
that it can be part of the solution and should be part of a Republican
transportation agenda.
Amtrak carried 30.2 million people last year, and expects FY 2012 will be
the ninth year of record ridership out of the past ten years. Last year, Amtrak
covered 86% of operating costs with non-federal dollars, including commercial
revenues. As you know, all forms of transportation enjoy some form of
federal support.
Passenger trains enjoy broad, bipartisan support in the U.S. Among
current Republican governors, for example, Michigan’s Rick Snyder presides over
one of the nation’s strongest state intercity passenger rail programs.
Also, Gov. Scott Walker continues to support improvements in the
state-supported Chicago-Milwaukee Amtrak service even though he killed his
predecessor’s plans to extend that service to Madison.
During recent House consideration of the FY 2013 transportation/housing
appropriations bill, some critical anti-Amtrak amendments were withdrawn and
the House actually approved more funding for Amtrak than is in the Senate
Appropriations Committee’s bill.
The business community, including many local chambers of commerce, provides
strong support for passenger trains, including along Amtrak’s long-distance
routes. Examples abound of revitalized passenger train stations spurring the
revival of adjacent Main Street business corridors, leading to economic growth
and job creation, and of trains serving as vital links to centers of
employment.
Our Association is a founding member of the OneRail Coalition, in which the
private railroads play a major role, because we recognize the broad range of
issues that freight and passenger interests have in common.
Although the “High Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Program” has been
criticized because of the paucity of “true high speed rail,” the nation badly
needed a program of federal aid to states that want to invest their own money
in intercity passenger rail. The words “and Intercity Passenger” were
added to the program’s name to reflect the importance of improving conventional
rail. This is one part of the Recovery Act that is continuing to provide
jobs, since the young program took time to launch, and it took time to reach
satisfactory agreements with the private railroads whose property in many cases
is benefitting from the investments such as improved travel times.
Republican Platforms From 2000 and 2008
In 2000, the Republican platform
stated, in part, “Our national railroad network is
a crucial component of our public transportation system. Railroads helped
build our country, and our national passenger railroad network remains a
precious resource that can play a key role in transportation and economic
growth. Republicans support a healthy intercity passenger rail system,
and where economically viable, the development of a national high-speed
passenger railroad system as an instrument of economic development, and
enhanced mobility. We also support a multi-modal approach to our
transportation needs.”
Discussion of transportation in
2008 did not mention rail but did include this: “We urgently
need to preserve the highway, transit, and air facilities built over the last
century so they can serve generations to come. At the same time, we are
committed to minimizing transportation’s impact on climate change, our local
environments, and the nation’s energy use. Careful reforms of environmental
reviews and the permitting process should speed projects to completion.”
[Click here for the full document.]