Small Communities Rally Around Southwest Chief

"It's part of our life. And once it's gone, it's gone."

That is the promise and the threat that motivates Mayor David Crase in his efforts to preserve Southwest Chief service in Garden City, Kansas.  It is a threat shared by many small communities along the line.  In “A Kansas town tries to keep the train coming through,” CNN Contributor Bob Greene outlines how the Amtrak train has woven itself into the very fabric of the Garden City community, providing a vital connection to the rest of America:

Garden City, with a population of around 28,000, has had its own daily passenger railroad service since the town was founded in rural southwest Kansas in the late 1800s. The Atchison,Topeka & Santa Fe sent its glamorous trains through Kansas on their way east and west. Garden City built its train station right downtown.

To have the station there made the town part of the grand and glorious thread that, railroad-stop-by-railroad-stop, connected the still-young nation, the thread that made the country seem, and feel, cohesive and whole.

But even for residents who never use the Southwest Chief, its presence is a symbol. The whistle sounds, as it has since the 1800s, and it signals that men and women from large cities and small will be stopping, however briefly, in their town, at their station.

However, there is trouble on the horizon.  The line between Newton,KS, and the Albuquerque area sees little or no freight traffic these days, and the obligation of owner BNSF Railway to maintain the tracks to acceptable passenger speeds is time-limited.  As outlined in Greene’s article, BNSF says that a tipping point has been reached:

This spring, the Garden City Telegram reported, Amtrak and BNSF held a meeting in Garden City with representatives of the communities the Southwest Chief serves in those three states—towns including Dodge City, Kansas; La Junta, Colorado; Raton, New Mexico. The Telegram reported that, because of the cost of maintaining the old tracks, the Southwest Chief may, within the next several years, be switched to an entirely different BNSF route, farther south.

The sums involved are not paltry. According to the Telegram, if the Southwest Chief is to stay on its traditional route with its traditional stations, $10 million per year for track-maintenance costs and a total of $100 million for long-term improvements must be found. If not, the alternate, passenger-train-ready BNSF tracks many miles to the south beckon.

Following conversations with officials involved in the matter, it is NARP’s understanding that the $100 million could be spread over 10 years, and that a five-way split may be possible—involving BNSF Railroad, Amtrak, and the states of Kansas, Colorado and New Mexico.

While the story is a few months old, it is an excellent summary of what a transportation link can mean to a community, and well worth reading in its entirety.  It also provides an important context to recent efforts to highlight the problems facing the Southwest Chief.  If the current alignment is to be maintained, securing the support of the small communities served—and the weight they bring in the political process—is invaluable. 

While trains are sometimes cast as an exclusively urban mode, Amtrak’s national network connects hundreds of small- and rural-communities to the larger economic markets.  It’s a point demonstrated in NARP’s analysis of the national network, "Long Distance Trains: Multipurpose Mobility Machines," which uses data from the Southwest Chief service to illustrate the unique benefits of train travel, and dispel misconceptions about how passengers utilize long distance routes:

[C]onsider the 2,265 mile corridor between Chicago and Los Angeles. Critics claim that air travel has made such routes obsolete; that it would be cheaper for government to buy each passenger an airline ticket than to run trains on this route. If trains ran non-stop between these two cities, the critics might be right. But the trains do not and the critics are wrong.

This route currently has just one train a day in each direction, the Southwest Chief, yet it attracts 355,000 passengers per year—466 per departure.  Because it makes 31 intermediate stops, it provides a mobility choice for twenty five million Americans who live within just 25 miles of a station (31 million who live within 50 miles) for short, medium and long distance trips between 528 different city pairs with each and every trip.

Data demonstrate that trip lengths vary from very short (as few as 10 to 40 miles) to very long (more than 2,000 miles) and everything in between. Please note that many passengers connect to other trains at Chicago, Kansas City and Los Angeles, so many trips are actually longer.

Raising awareness among the small communities that often have the most to lose is critical to broadening the base of support for passenger trains.

Comments   

 
0 #11 Rick Burn 2013-02-05 19:00
I understand the history of the Santa Fe trail and the romance of cities like Dodge City and Garden City.

However, as a NARP member, I do not want to my taxpayer dollars wasted on Western Kansas when more people can be exposed to trains in Wichita, Alva, Amarillo, and Clovis.

We have enough anti train people in the United States and the route via Dodge and Garden Cities becomes a point to stand on.

I still suggest it is time for a reroute and abandonment of the line west of La Junta.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Inez A Ross 2013-02-05 18:16
Keep the Trail Train

I'm a member of NARP and the Santa Fe Trail Association, also a frequent traveler on the Southwest Chief between Lamy, NM, to Los Angeles or to Chicago. I’ve taken student groups on the train to planetariums in Hutchinson KS, Chicago, and L.A. Living in Los Alamos, I’d have to drive 100 miles to catch the train in Albuquerque if the northern route of the Chief were discontinued.
Six or seven other cities in NM, CO, and KS at greater distances would lose direct passenger access to the train.

More importantly, riders on an alternate route would miss the most scenic and historic part of the trip, the Santa Fe Trail. The route of the Chief parallels the Santa Fe Trail between Kansas City and Santa Fe. On summer weekends volunteers from the Park Service give tour talks from the lounge car of the train, pointing out special sites and the ruts of the Trail. On Raton Pass, the highest point on the line, there are elk and bear sightings, plus a view of the Wooten Ranch, where Wooten built the old toll road for covered wagons to climb over the pass. In Apache Canyon there are Civil War markers. (The Battle of Glorieta Pass is now referred to as the Gettysburg of the West.)

A main goal of the SFTA in keeping the Trail alive is to invite people to see and enjoy this part of America’s heritage. The SW Chief route and the Trail are historically interlinked. A recent task force study of the situation recommends keeping the present route of the Chief, but notes that funding for track upgrade is the big problem. We need to contact all local, state, and national governments to urge help for keeping the Trail Train Alive!

Inez Ross
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Inez A Ross 2013-02-05 14:25
Hello
Quote
 
 
0 #8 Inez A Ross 2013-02-04 05:56
I'm a member of NARP and of the Santa Fe Trail Associattion, a frequent traveler on the Chief.We are pleading for funding to keep the rail route that parallels the Trail. Passengers would lose the most beautiful and historic part, if the Chief is rerouted south. Living in Los Alamos NM I would have to drive 100 miles to catch the Chief at Albuquerque.Lam y is restoring the Harvey House Legal
Tender. Park Service summer talks on the train educate and entertain passengers and point out the visible ruts of the Trail. I have taken student groups to planetariums in Chicago, L.A. and Hutchinson, leaving from Lamy. A letter to President Obama elicited a list of many stimulus funds, but none for the SW Chief. Much money is spent on highways and support for airlines;our long distance route needs equal funding. I have suggested a revival of the CCC in the name of CTC! We'll help lay tracks! Jobs could be created by doing so. The Santa Fe Trail was the earliest of the Western Trails and the Chief not only parallels it, but in places IS the Trail. See the signs at Raton Pass, the highest point, and the view of Wooten Ranch, the first toll road, and see the Civil War memorials while passing thru Apache Canyon. I've hiked the entire Trail with 4 other women and wrote in my book, Without A Wagon,"The railroad killed the wagon road in 1880 they say, but the train still follows the Santa Fe Trail, almost all the way. Let's save the Trail Train's route!
Quote
 
 
0 #7 Griffiths 2013-01-30 21:13
There is so much wrong with this report, that one doesn't know where to begin. What rail we have is in poor condition and generally dominated by freight. Most rail is "old bed" and maintained poorly, if at all. I recently travelled several thousand miles around the country. I brought my gps along (for rental car use to fill in gaps in rail coverage) and so deployed it on the trains. It told me what's coming up and our speed. Countless times, we slowed to incredibly low speeds (under 20 mph), many of which, I believe were due to very rough track or leaning the wrong way on curves, common to old track.
America invented and designed rail travel yet now we are the most backward country in it. The countries we defeated in WW2, currently have far faster and superior rail to us. Our highways are a mess, partly due to big trucking, who worked and continues to work against subsidized rail to avoid competition.
By now we should have the greatest rail in the world, but we have probably, the worst. Huge industries and conglomerates campaign against funding rail. At the rate China is going, they may soon have more high speed rail than the rest of the world combined and will pay for a lot of it with earnings from "It's cheaper to get it from China" America. Are we still a great nation, or were we just formerly a great nation? Can trains be faster than planes? Compare a bullet train going 220 mph to say, a 1000 mile plane trip at 440 mph. Don't forget
the travel time to the airport,(say 1 hr each way), time at the airport for checkin, baggage and security (1-1/2 hrs?) and the flight (2-1/2 hrs?). Total=6 hrs. 1000/220=4-1/2 hrs train time. And, the train traveller got to walk around, go to the restaurant or snack bar cars or hang out in the view cars, all the while able to use his laptop. We're crazy to keep rejecting trains. Lastly, when a plane stops, it falls out of the air; a train just safely sits there awaiting repair.
Quote
 
 
0 #6 Rick Burn 2013-01-30 06:28
Dwaine,

Kansas does not provide any money for passenger trains. The old route is just history up to 1910 when the Southern Route via Amarillo opened.

As for sidings, the route via Amarillo is double track with bi directional signals. A much better railroad serving more people.

As I said before, the current route has interstate highway following the track from Trinidad, CO to Albuquerque while the Southern Route does not follow the Interstate Highways.
Quote
 
 
0 #5 Dwaine Manning 2013-01-30 02:05
Mark: You seem pretty certain of a reroute for the old Chief. As do I. Considering the history,it is a shame. My concern was the parking in Wichita,not Newton. But that is of little concern compared to the loss of another connection. We would love to be able to go West to Denver, Grand Junction and beyond,but there is no connection. Currently we have to drive to Newton, go east,(almost to Chicago),just to catch a west bound.The alternative is drive to Omaha. People need more connections.
While I know nothing of the condition and quality of the rail between Wichita and Alburquerque, the quantity of tracks is important in passenger service. Competition with 'Chinese WalMart DooDad' freighters diminish the passenger experience if travelers are immobile on sidings.
I don't consider myself part of the 'online community', I don't even have a computer, and I'm not fighting the inevitable. I'm just lamenting the fact that Lamy NM is special to me, and it could be lost along with countless towns when they lose their rail,their cafe, their post office.
As a horticulturist I realize that sometimes you have to prune. Sometimes cut it back to the roots. But sometimes, you don't end up with much.
Just getting it off my chest.
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Mark Meyer 2013-01-29 18:01
Dwaine: With regard to your concern about parking at Newton, when (not if) the train is rerouted, the train will still go through Newton before going to Wichita and beyond. I, too, understand that there will negative consequences for existing communities (between Newton and Albuquerque) when the train is rerouted. But as long as Amtrak continues to pour money down a bottomless pit that will only require more and more scarce resources without any hope of assistance in the form of infrastructure improvement associated with running freight trains, this will hurt ALL Amtrak trains. It would be truly ironic if one or more long distance trains have to be discontinued due to the additional costs of the current route. I don't blame the online communities for fighting the reroute, even though in the end it will be futile. I would expect some acknowledgement of the reality of the situation from NARP which prides itself on understanding the complexities of the economics of passenger trains in the United States. So far, however, this has not happened. I am interested in NARP's logic in focusing on this untenable situation that will negatively affect all other long distance trains.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Dwaine Manning 2013-01-29 17:37
I drive the fifty miles at two in the morning to Newton with two young grandsons in tow to catch the Southwest Chief. We enjoy the small towns along the way,(Dodge City, La Junta, Raton). We often go to Santa Fe from Lamy. We are going to Flagstaff and the Grand Canyon as soon as school is out.
In Newton I have to park nearly two blocks fron the depot, but the pickup has never been broken into or harmed. Although Wichita would be closer, I question security downtown.
No offense to Amarillo, but if I wanted to see more flatland, I'd just stay home. I'm sure it will boil down to economics, but the economies, and the lives along the existing route will surely be affected negatively .
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 Rick Burn 2013-01-29 00:19
Mark, you make very valid points. In addition, Wichita, Amarillo, and Clovis have much larger populations and that route does not parallel Interstate Highways like the current route does from Trinidad, CO to Albuquerque. There is also Northwest Oklahoma State University in Alva, OK on the line.

Looks like time for a reroute to the Southern Route.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

РіРѕСЂРѕСЃРєРѕРї телефонная база телефонная база данных алматы ссылка телефонный справочник СЃРІСЏР·Рё beeline справочник телефонов кировограда база данных номера мобильных телефонов Р Р† санкт - петербурге тут найти номер телефона Р Р† англии справочник телефонов Р Р† запорожской совместимость РіРѕСЂРѕСЃРєРѕРїРѕРІ РѕРІРЅР° Р С‘ СЃРєРѕСЂРїРёРѕРЅР° сотовый телефонный справочник 2012 узнать адрес РІРѕ владивостоке Р С—Р С• фамилии биллайн телефонная Р Р…Р В° сайте как телефонная база здесь sitemap