 | NARP blogTRAINS: A travel choice Americans want |
» Visit the Official NARP Website
Trains Help Revitalize America’s Cities and Towns
Monday, November 12, 2007
I recently took Amtrak’s Pacific Surfliner train from San Diego to Los Angeles Union Station, one of America’s great scenic train rides and Amtrak’s busiest route outside of Boston to New York and Washington, D.C.
During the trip into Los Angeles, I discovered that there was a large contingent on the train heading to a concert at the recently opened Nokia Theater at the new L.A. Live center in Downtown Los Angeles, which is just a short distance from Union Station via the Metro Rail. Before the Nokia Theater opened, these folks taking the train would have had to drive to non Metro Rail accessible concert venues scattered across the Los Angeles area. Whether they came from San Diego or San Luis Obispo or the many suburban and rural communities along the route of the Surfliner, the train allowed them to avoid traffic and ride in comfort.
Downtown Los Angeles is undergoing a renaissance of residential, entertainment, and commercial development. Thousands of new residences are being built in Los Angeles’ long neglected center.
Planners now realize that America’s neglected city and town centers should revitalized as a sustainable strategy to accommodate growth into the future. This pattern, emulated around the country, is usually called smart growth or transit oriented development. Intercity rail and rail transit play a large role in this. Those that have access to trains put out much less climate changing carbon emissions than people who have to drive more.
And as anyone who can take the train regularly for work or pleasure can attest, train travel leads to much better quality-of-life than driving and flying exclusively. Whether you’re taking a commuter train or the spectacular Empire Builder across Montana, train travel is a much more civilized, sensitive way to experience our great country.
Recently our Executive Director Ross Capon was interviewed on NPR’s The Diane Rehm Show to discuss Senate Bill 294, Amtrak, and other passenger rail issues. One caller to the show lamented that, while she would like to take the train to Cleveland, Ohio, the early morning time of the train’s arrival combined with the economically distressed state of downtown Cleveland dissuades her.
Trains thrive especially on vibrant destinations in America’s cities and small towns. Recently our board of directors traveled to North Carolina and took the state supported Amtrak route The Piedmont. North Carolina’s DOT over the past few years has undertaken renovations at many of the region’s old railroad stations. Once run down stations are now assets to their communities and focal points for the revitalization of their host communities, from cities to small towns.
What can you do to help? Call your member of the House of Representatives and let them know that you support Senate Bill 294, the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act. This bipartisan reauthorization of Amtrak recently passed the Senate by a resounding 70 votes to just 22 against. It must now be introduced in the House’s Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and voted out for consideration by the House Rules Committee and, eventually, the full House. It’s important that this vital piece of legislation get to the President soon.
By increasing investment in Amtrak in partnership with the states, S.294 will help Amtrak connect communities and improve them – just as it is already doing along The Piedmont in North Carolina and along the Pacific Surfliner route in Southern California.
--Dennis Lytton
NARP Board Member
Los Angeles, California
Posted by NARP
Tags: amtrak reauthorization, dennis lytton, transit-oriented development,Transit Helps Fight Climate Change
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Art Guzzetti of the American Public Transportation Association gave the shortest presentation at a recent Washington conference, but one with the most relevance to public transit advocates.
He asked, “How much oil does transit save?”
Answer: the equivalent of 300,000 gas station fill-ups daily, or 34 supertankers leaving the Middle East 11 days (34 in a year), or total U.S. imports from Kuwait in a year. But that’s just direct savings. Multiply by a factor of three to reflect indirect benefits, such as the more energy-efficient, denser real estate development that transit enables.
“By how much does transit reduce carbon emissions?” Transit directly saves 6.9 million metric tons annually. Taking into account indirect savings, this number jumps to 37 million metric tons.
He also noted that, in a typical household, just one person switching their commute from automobile to transit would reduce the carbon footprint of that household by 10%. And if that household is able to get by with one less car overall, the carbon footprint of that household will be reduced 30%. There are few household choices that have an impact of this magnitude.
The conference was the “First Transportation Convention,” held March 5-7 in Washington, DC. The conference was organized by the City of Irving, Texas, “as an extension of the annual Transportation Summit held in August” in Texas.
--Ross Capon
Posted by NARP
Tags: apta, climate change, transit, transit-oriented development,©2006 National Association of Railroad Passengers | » NARP website
» Recent Entries
» Blogroll
» Terms of Service for Comments
You may register to post comments in response to NARP-generated postings on the Blog. By registering you agree 1) that all comments will be relevant to the respective posting and 2) not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We reserve the right to permanently block postings from any user who does not abide by the above terms. NARP reserves the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason.
» Monthly Archives
