 | NARP blogTRAINS: A travel choice Americans want |
» Visit the Official NARP Website
Three Short Items
Monday, September 24, 2007
The Washington Post today published my letter to the editor. I note the failure of their ‘congested airways’ editorials to mention rail service as one part of the solution, and referenced NARP’s plan to “bring passenger trains to 103 more metropolitan areas and more options to people who already have some train service.” In the hard copy edition, the letter is the most conspicuous on the page as it is the only one set off by a box, and the length of my title and the organization’s name are long enough to provide considerable white space immediately to their left and further draw the eye’s attention to the box.
Getting closer. The Post on September 22 reported that, according to DOE’s Energy Information Administration, the inflation-adjusted high for U.S. oil prices was $92.91 a barrel in January 1981. Also, “the October futures contract on the Nymex reached a record $83.90 on Thursday, its last day of trading.” The current front-month West Texas Intermediate contract, November, closed Friday at 81.62.
And perhaps some good news for the Southwest Chief. Cemex, the “growing global materials company” based in Monterrey, Mexico, on Sept. 18 announced “it intends to begin the permitting process for the construction of a 1.9 million short ton cement manufacturing facility near Seligman, Ariz. CEMEX will invest approximately $400 million over five years in the Seligman Crossing Plant, which is expected to begin operations by 2012.” Cemex says “the historical shortage of building materials in Arizona and the southwestern United States, coupled with demographic trends that show robust population growth throughout the region, reinforces the need for the…plant.” The Arizona Republic reports “the plant would bring 700 construction jobs to the remote part of the state where higher-wage jobs are scarce. Between 110 to 130 people would work at the plant when it opens in 2011.” The paper calls Seligman “an unincorporated community of about 800 people, “ and says the plant would also benefit other area communities including Kingman, Flagstaff and Williams (all Chief stops). The train used to stop in Seligman, which is 85 miles west of Flagstaff, 55 miles west of Amtrak’s relatively new stop at Williams Junction and 88 miles east of Kingman.
--Ross B. Capon, NARP Executive Director
Posted by NARP
Tags: narp vision, price of oil, washington post,Some early reflections on the election
Wednesday, November 05, 2008
There’s no question that, by all indications, including their Senate records, Obama/Biden hold the greatest promise for improving America’s passenger train system. And the environment in which they are operating is more supportive of trains than was the case in the 1990s, when close ties between the Clinton White House and the Amtrak Board prevented Amtrak from even requesting the full amounts authorized for it.
At the same time, the number of other urgent issues crowding the national agenda is greater—greater even than it was a few months ago. So we have to remember the words of FDR to his supporters: “You’ve elected me, now organize a movement to make me do what you want.”
Having supporters in the White House and Congress is no guarantee of success. Those supporters still have the same budget numbers and the same set of rules that were in place prior to the election. And, right now at least, lower gasoline prices are cited as a major reason for defeat of a Kansas City light rail ballot measure. Longer-term, the declines in energy investment now happening in response to those lower prices, could set the stage for another dramatic price rise—and still more pressure for passenger trains.
Right now, the task is to keep that pressure on in spite of low gas prices. Some of the strongest potential supporters may be Democratic legislators who initially were not thought to have a serious chance of winning and who, as a result, may not have been vetted (or “re-grooved”) by highway interests to the same extent as “strong” candidates were, and who therefore may come into office with more sympathy for our cause.
For the nation as a whole, it may be a good thing that Democrats did not achieve the 60 votes they need to cut off debate without Republican help. This lessens the temptation for Democrats to run roughshod over their colleagues, at the risk of paying dearly in future elections. But for passenger trains, it is not good that Capitol Hill Republicans as a group likely will be even less supportive in the next Congress than in the current one. It is a reminder that the new law contains many report requirements, most of which look like they were designed by people who don’t like passenger trains (or at least long-distance passenger trains). By the way, there will be many changes in key Republican positions…there will be a big shuffle as a result of the defeat of Rep. Joe Knollenberg (MI), top Republican on the House appropriations subcommittee. The same is true on the Senate side if Ted Stevens (AK), top Republican on the appropriations defense subcommittee, is not elected or does not continue to serve.
When David Gunn headed Amtrak, he used to nod towards Capitol Hill and say, “Those folks aren’t going to kill the trains. It’s the railroads growing inability to handle all their traffic.” Well, the railroads have made great progress in dealing with capacity and with dispatching passenger trains, thanks in part to the on-time performance ruckus NARP raised two years ago, and to the way Federal Railroad Administrator Joe Boardman and indeed Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters picked up that issue and ran with it.
Today, the greatest threat to the long-distance trains may be the age of the equipment, most dramatically illustrated by Amtrak’s inability or unwillingness to put full dining cars on the Lake Shore Limited. The real test for the national network will be whether Amtrak continues to push hard for new equipment for the long-distance trains and whether that push produces results.
For now, be sure to congratulate your new legislators on their victories and work hard to get our agenda in front of them, including full funding of the new law, and acquisition of the equipment needed to expand and update the long-distance trains. And press appointment of transportation officials who recognize the value of a more balanced transportation policy--one with a broader role for passenger trains, to improve overall record of U.S. transportation regarding safety, energy efficiency, and provision of good choices to citizens.
--Ross Capon
Posted by NARP
Tags: amtrak, congress, oil, presidential election, price of oil, usdot,©2006 National Association of Railroad Passengers | » NARP website
» Recent Entries
» Blogroll
» Terms of Service for Comments
You may register to post comments in response to NARP-generated postings on the Blog. By registering you agree 1) that all comments will be relevant to the respective posting and 2) not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We reserve the right to permanently block postings from any user who does not abide by the above terms. NARP reserves the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason.
» Monthly Archives
