|
|||
Southern Cities Discovering that Trains Mean BusinessFriday, July 30, 2010For the past few decades, city boosters in Charlotte, NC, have wanted the Queen City to become more like Atlanta—taking advantage of its location to become one of the Southeast’s premier business hubs. Now, when it comes to modern transportation, it’s Atlanta that is looking enviously towards Charlotte. Both locales, like all medium- and large-sized US cities, had streetcar networks early in the 20th century. But while Atlanta does have the 30-year-old MARTA heavy rail transit system, it lacks modern streetcar or light rail lines. Charlotte, meanwhile, opened its first light rail line in 2007 and has plans to greatly expand the system. Just this week, Charlotte’s City Council agreed to accept a $25 million federal grant to build an east-west streetcar line to connect with the north-south LYNX light rail line. There are some plans afoot to build new rail transit lines in Atlanta, and a funding application was made in February for a streetcar on Peachtree Street, but Georgia has yet to receive any federal grants for transit. And it’s not just transit—intercity passenger rail has a lot to do with it as well. Charlotte is connected to Greensboro and Raleigh by six daily Amtrak round-trips, with two daily round-trips linking it to the Northeast Corridor—a link that the Southeast High-Speed Rail Corridor aims to solidify. Credit for this can be given to the state of North Carolina’s decades of planning and investment, while Georgia has spent next to nothing on trains, the result being that Atlanta is served by only one daily Amtrak train in each direction and high(er)-speed rail is a much longer ways off. This has Atlanta business leaders worried that the metro area, which is suffering from worsening traffic congestion and deteriorating transit service, may be losing jobs to cities like Charlotte. MARTA and its connecting suburban bus systems have the dubious distinction of being the only urban transit system not to receive state funds—they are funded primarily by a 1% sales tax levied only in the counties they serve. This left these systems particularly vulnerable to the effects of the recession on sales tax revenue, resulting major service cutbacks. Yet the Atlanta area remains far behind in the competition for federal transit dollars because its planning process is not as far along as those of Charlotte and other cities. Hopefully the success of Charlotte’s rail transit investments in catalyzing smarter development—aided by better intercity train connections—will finally persuade Georgia’s political leaders to get serious about passenger rail. Not only are trains (and buses) an essential lifeline for those without access to cars, but they are the most proven way to combat crippling congestion while creating jobs and desirable places to live and work—places centered on people, not cars. —Malcolm Kenton Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (1) CommentsTrains Already Using “Smart Grid”Monday, July 26, 2010A feature in E Magazine’s July/August 2010 cover story takes a look at the potential for plug-in electric cars to be part of a remodeled grid that gives consumers more control over how much energy they use and when, and would even allow people to reduce their power bills by giving electricity back to the grid. Electric cars would store the energy produced through braking and give it back to the grid when plugged in. Federal grants from the Department of Energy, totaling $100 million, are going to develop pilot programs for this technology in five states. Meanwhile, electrified railroads like Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor have been regenerating electricity through dynamic braking for several years. Even when both cars and trains are fueled by electricity and not by gasoline or diesel, there’s no escaping trains’ superior efficiency—or their unique capacity to foster less energy-intensive, land-consuming development patterns. Investing in the expansion of passenger train service on electrified railroads (along with green energy sources) would deliver a much greater bang for the public’s buck. —Malcolm Kenton Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (0) CommentsFlag Stops: New Ideas, New ChallengesMonday, July 19, 2010A roundup of news and views on passenger train issues.
—Malcolm Kenton Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (0) CommentsLouisiana Moves ForwardThursday, July 08, 2010After his efforts to thwart progress towards establishing passenger train service between Louisiana’s capital (Baton Rouge) and its largest city (New Orleans) were met with resistance from citizens, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R)—known for his criticism of government spending—took a major positive step by signing a law that will create the Louisiana Interstate Rail Compact and authorize cities and parishes (i.e. counties) within the state to form their own compacts to develop passenger rail. These compacts will be able to oversee the design, construction, operation and maintenance of train services, and will have the power to float bonds and raise revenues, subject to the approval of the voters in the affected jurisdictions. In the law’s language [PDF] is the state legislature’s finding that “The development, improvement, expansion, and maintenance of an efficient, safe, and well-maintained system of railways, transitways, and other transportation facilities that promote mobility are essential to Louisiana’s economic health and are intended to act as a system that provides a basis for business and industry to compete cost effectively on a regional, national, and global scale in order to provide a high quality of life for the people of this state.” NARP applauds Governor Jindal and the legislature—thanks to the leadership of Rep. Michael Jackson (I-Baton Rouge)—for putting in place the framework for ongoing investment in increasing Louisianians’ mobility choices and thereby improving the state and region’s quality of life. If you live in Louisiana, please take a moment to send the Governor a note of your approval and encouragement. —Malcolm Kenton Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (0) CommentsMisdirected PrioritiesTuesday, July 06, 2010The New York Times reminds us of the extent to which oil extraction is one of America’s most heavily-subsidized activities. Imagine how much the quality of our lives and our environment would improve if these perverse subsidies were eliminated and part of the savings redirected to investments in an expanded network of modern passenger trains. —Malcolm Kenton Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (0) Comments©2010 National Association of Railroad Passengers | » NARP website |
» Recent Entries» Monthly Archives |
||