|
|||
|
» Visit the Official NARP Website Congestion, Highways, and TransitTuesday, October 09, 2007Some critics of transit, and especially rail, argue that “reducing congestion” is a main reason for building rail transit. When they see that congestion isn’t reduced, or isn’t reduced noticeably, they then attack transit as wasteful. (They ignore building new roads as a failed strategy for reducing congestion.) The real justifications for rail transit are:
While road congestion certainly has an economic cost, it can also be seen as indicative of a strong economy; conversely, a devastating recession would reduce congestion. The other ways to reduce congestion are: (a) severe congestion pricing on roads; (b) massive commitment to transit and transit-friendly development. The latter is probably essential before the former could be politically doable. Conclusion: it is a classic “straw man” argument to say that eliminating or dramatically reducing congestion is a (or the) main justification for introducing rail transit. Some transit critics use this argument to get their readers to ignore transit’s real benefits.
--Ross B. Capon,
Posted by NARPTags:(0) Comments ©2006 National Association of Railroad Passengers | » NARP website |
» Recent Entries» Blogroll» Terms of Service for CommentsYou may register to post comments in response to NARP-generated postings on the Blog. By registering you agree 1) that all comments will be relevant to the respective posting and 2) not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We reserve the right to permanently block postings from any user who does not abide by the above terms. NARP reserves the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason. » Monthly Archives |
||