Szabo: Higher-speed Passenger and Freight Trains Can Coexist

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

A recent article in the Economist magazine discusses some freight railroads’ concerns that higher-speed passenger trains on their tracks would hamper their business. Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph Szabo—whose agency has proposed guidelines that railroads accepting public funds should meet regarding passenger service levels—wrote the following unpublished letter to Economist in response:

Your article “High-speed Railroading” (July 24) did an excellent job of articulating the many benefits of the American freight rail system, which is truly the best in the world. The Obama Administration has committed significant resources to maintaining and improving that system, through investments in crucial freight rail infrastructure like the recent TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) grant for the Crescent Corridor Intermodal Freight Rail project.

However, the assertion in the article that freight and passenger rail cannot successfully coexist is not supported by the facts. On the contrary, passenger and freight rail have been successfully sharing infrastructure since the beginning of railroading more than 150 years ago. With good modeling, planning and engineering, we can ensure capacity levels appropriate to the operating needs of both. That is why we are working closely with States and host freight railroads to reach operating agreements that define responsibilities, achieve balance between the private and public interests, and ensure optimal operations for both interests.
The Economist implies that these balanced agreements are unachievable, but through open dialogue and good-faith negotiations, the States and the freight railroads can finalize agreements that ensure strong service outcomes and allow both types of rail to prosper. In many cases, high-speed rail investments will add double and triple tracks, as well as new sidings and signal improvements, which over time will allow freight and high-speed passenger trains to coexist at the optimal speeds for each. This process will require hard work, but win-win agreements that grow passenger and freight rail service will bring the highest level of benefits to the nation by relieving highway congestion, improving air quality and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. That’s a win for every American citizen.

Posted by Malcolm Kenton | (1) Comments

Next entry: Trains: Enhancing Freedom of Mobility Previous entry: Acela Should Be the Mold for Modern American Trains

Comments

“On the contrary, passenger and freight rail have been successfully sharing infrastructure since the beginning of railroading more than 150 years ago. “

Seriously? This shows a real lack of familiarity with the Silver Service south of DC. Waiting for CSX to finish running through is one of the most annoying shortfalls of our current passenger rail [lack of] infrastructure.

With the growing interest in passenger rail, I hope there’s a corresponding growth in passenger-only track.

Comment by William Bailey on 08/10 at 04:43 PM

» Please login or register for an account to post a comment.

©2005 National Association of Railroad Passengers | » NARP website

» Recent Entries

» Blogroll

National & General

Regional & Local

» Terms of Service for Comments

You may register to post comments in response to NARP-generated postings on the Blog. By registering you agree 1) that all comments will be relevant to the respective posting and 2) not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We reserve the right to permanently block postings from any user who does not abide by the above terms. NARP reserves the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason.

» Monthly Archives

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom
What is RSS?

National Association of Railroad Passengers on Facebook