Amtrak and Bicycles: Time to Think Outside Those Boxes

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

John Henry
Special Contributor

It’s hard to imagine a more environmentally friendly marriage of transportation modes than passenger trains and bicycles. Yet as America struggles to conserve energy and reduce its collective carbon footprint, Amtrak has no provision for carrying bikes on many trains and often makes it difficult to take them on others.

As a result, the nation’s intercity rail system lags far behind its counterparts in Western Europe, where cyclists have long been able to roll their bike onto trains. Amtrak also lags behind the many commuter rail and subway systems in this country that now provide easy access for two-wheelers, enabling cyclists to travel long distances without ever having to set foot in a motor vehicle.

To be sure, Amtrak, which boasts that it “strives for greener passenger rail every day through eco-smart practices and programs,” does operate some trains with European-style roll-on service for bikes. But this convenient feature is limited to state-subsidized trains in California, Oregon, Washington, Missouri, downstate Illinois, North Carolina and on the Boston-Portland, Maine, route.

Cyclists in the Northeast actually have less roll-on service than a decade ago, when Amtrak operated three state-funded trains with bike racks in baggage cars. Those trains, which serve the Adirondack region of New York State and Vermont, have run without baggage cars for several years and no longer take bikes.

» read more...

Posted by NARP

Tags: amtrak, bicycles, bike racks, checked baggage, cyclists, green travel, travel alternatives
(0) Comments

Deepwater Horizon, Energy, U.S. DOT and Trains

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Quoting again from the June 11 Philip Stephens column in Financial Times, “The reason the Deepwater Horizon rig is there is because the US consumes a quarter of world oil production even though it has only one-twentieth of the population.”

A major reason that the US has such high per capita energy consumption is our high reliance on automobiles and aviation. The world has an average of 107 motorcars per 1,000 inhabitants, but the U.S. has 765 cars per 1,000 people. That compares with 516 in Europe (15 nations), 188 in the Russian Federation, 14 in China and 11 in India.

Simply raising CAFÉ (miles per gallon) standards does not address the “external” energy costs of the automobile—including pedestrian-unfriendly development and widely-spaced buildings which themselves consume energy inefficiently.

In 2007 (the most recent figures available), automobiles averaged 28% more energy consumed per passenger-mile than Amtrak. Domestic airlines averaged 19% more than Amtrak. If the nation had invested adequately in passenger trains, Amtrak’s showing would have been even better.

Secretary LaHood deserves credit for the fact that the draft U.S. DOT Strategic Plan FY 2010-FY2015 [PDF] says most of the right things. Here are some quotes from the Executive Summary, starting with its first sentence: “President Barack Obama supports a transformative U.S. transportation policy that improves public health and safety, fosters livable communities, ensures that transportation assets are maintained in a state of good repair, supports the Nation’s long-term economic competitiveness, and works to achieve environmental sustainability…In addition to the sustainable development patterns associated with livable communities, DOT will also promote the substitution of carbon intensive travel on congested highways and airways for use of more energy efficient transportation systems, including rail, water, and pipelines where feasible.”

We need the White House to connect those dots more frequently!

—Ross Capon

Posted by NARP

Tags: consumption, deepwater horizon, energy policy, obama, oil dependence, oil disaster, oil spill, ray lahood, strategic plan, transportation, us dot
(0) Comments

Bringing Trains into the “Energy Mix”

Monday, June 14, 2010

In a Washington Post Business section column yesterday, economic policy expert Ezra Klein drives home a truth that is unwelcome to many Americans: gasoline in the U.S. is actually too cheap because prices do not account for the societal and environmental costs associated with its use. The Gulf oil disaster is one of the more visible externalities (to use the economist’s term) of the oil market.

Klein quotes Ian Perry of the think tank Resources for the Future: “We’re pretty much stuck with our dependency on oil. We don’t have any substitutes. Even if we hugely increase the price on oil, we’d only have limited impact on it. People need to drive and get to work.” Therein lies the flaw in the thinking of those who look at Big Oil as the only problem: it’s not just oil that we are over-dependent on—the U.S. cannot maintain its addiction to driving.

To simply switch to a cleaner, greener fuel source while continuing to consume energy at our present rates would be impossible—we can’t generate that much energy from renewables within a workable time frame. We need to get serious about using less energy, and there’s no getting around the gross ineffeciency inherent in a transportation system that is so unilaterally oriented towards motor vehicles. As Dr. Wolfgang Meyer, who studied the question of “green fuels,” concludes, the amount of infrastructure needed to power the current U.S. auto fleet on renewables is off-the-charts impossible.

A world-class passenger train system—intercity trains connected with local and regional transit supporting walkable, bikeable communities—can move Americans quickly and comfortably using a small fraction of the energy that our mobility currently consumes. Trains must be a key component of the “clean-energy future” President Obama is advocating. We must take every opportunity to remind our elected officials to make it so.

—Malcolm Kenton

Posted by Malcolm Kenton

Tags: alternative fuels, big oil, conservation, consumption, ezra klein, gas prices, gulf oil spill, passenger trains, petroleum, transportation, unsustainable
(0) Comments

An Oily Warning

Friday, June 11, 2010

As oil keeps billowing into the Gulf of Mexico, the nation’s attention is focused on yet another of the significant consequences of our overdependence on fossil fuels and overreliance on inefficient technologies. While we hope that the gusher can be safely plugged or diverted as quickly as possible, we have to recognize that every crisis presents an opportunity to shift our society onto a course that will minimize the chances of such devastation occurring again. The spill is a wake-up call that what’s at stake when it comes to transportation policy is the quality of our lives, and those of the ecosystems on which we depend.

Financial Times columnist Philip Stephens says President Obama must use this opportunity “to shape a new conversation about the unavoidable links between oil spills, climate change and sustainable economic growth.” “If the world’s richest nation and biggest oil consumer is not ready to curb the greenhouse emissions that cause global warming,” he cautions, “no one else, least of all China, is going to make the switch to a low carbon economy.”

As the Senate prepares to take up a major energy and climate change measure, the way for which was paved by yesterday’s vote, we need to remind Senators that the revenue generated by a carbon levy on transportation fuels ought to support the development of the most efficient, Earth-friendly form of motorized transport—passenger trains. Revenues from the transportation system should go towards programs like TIGER that use competitive bidding to steer federal dollars to where they can have the most impact in enhancing the quality, while shrinking the carbon footprint, of the US transportation system—along with direct investment in passenger rail, both through the states and through Amtrak.

The longer we wait before taking serious steps towards a saner transportation system, the more the economic, social and environmental price tag of the status quo goes up.

—Malcolm Kenton

Posted by Malcolm Kenton

Tags: climate change, deepwater horizon, ecosystems, fossil fuels, gulf oil disaster, investment, oil spill, passenger trains, quality of life, tiger, transportation
(0) Comments

» Recent Entries

» Blogroll

National & General

Regional & Local

» Terms of Service for Comments

You may register to post comments in response to NARP-generated postings on the Blog. By registering you agree 1) that all comments will be relevant to the respective posting and 2) not to post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, or that violate any laws. We reserve the right to permanently block postings from any user who does not abide by the above terms. NARP reserves the right to remove, edit, or move any messages for any reason.